Cosmology is the study of the origins and eventual fate of
the universe. Physical cosmology is the scholarly and scientific study of the
origin, evolution, structure, dynamics, and ultimate fate of the universe, as
well as the natural laws that keep it in order.[1] Religious cosmology (or
mythological cosmology) is a body of beliefs based on the historical,
mythological, religious, and esoteric literature and traditions of creation and
eschatology.
Physical cosmology is studied by scientists, such as
astronomers, and theoretical physicists; and academic philosophers, such as
metaphysicians, philosophers of physics, and philosophers of space and time.
Modern cosmology is dominated by the Big Bang theory, which attempts to bring
together observational astronomy and particle physics.[2]
Although the word cosmology is recent (first used in 1730 in
Christian Wolff's Cosmologia Generalis), the study of the universe has a long
history involving science, philosophy, esotericism and religion. Related
studies include cosmogony, which focuses on the origin of the Universe, and cosmography,
which maps the features of the Universe. Cosmology is also connected to
astronomy. However, they are contrasted in that while the former is concerned
with the Universe as a whole, the latter deals with individual celestial
objects.
Disciplines
In old times, physics and astrophysics have played a central
role in shaping the understanding of the universe through scientific
observation and experiment. What is known as physical cosmology shaped through
both mathematics and observation the analysis of the whole universe. It is
generally understood to begin with the Big Bang, followed almost
instantaneously by cosmic inflation - an expansion of space from which the
universe is thought to have emerged ~13.7±0.2×109 (roughly 13.5–13.9 billion)
years ago.[3]
Physical cosmologists propose that the history of the
universe has been governed entirely by physical laws. Between the domains of
religion and science stands the philosophical perspective of metaphysical
cosmology. This ancient field of study seeks to draw intuitive conclusions
about the nature of the universe, man, a supernatural creator, and/or their
relationships based on the extension of some set of presumed facts borrowed
from spiritual experience and/or observation.[citation needed]
Metaphysical cosmology has also been described as the
placing of man in the universe in relationship to all other entities. This is
exemplified by the observation made by Marcus Aurelius of a man's place in that
relationship: "He who does not know what the world is does not know where
he is, and he who does not know for what purpose the world exists, does not
know who he is, nor what the world is."[4]
Religious creation myths explain existence and nature of
reality. Views about the origin (cosmogony) and final condition (eschatology)
of the universe are foundational elements of a religious understanding of
humanity's role in the universe.[citation needed]
Esoteric cosmology is distinguished from religion in its
less tradition-bound construction and reliance on modern "intellectual
understanding" rather than faith, and from philosophy in its emphasis on spirituality
as a formative concept.[citation needed]
[edit]Historical cosmologies
Further information: Timeline of cosmology
Name Author and date Classification Remarks
Hindu cosmology Hindu
Rigveda (2000 BC) Cyclical or oscillating, Infinite in time One cycle of existence is around 311
trillion years and the life of one universe around 8 billion years. This
Universal cycle is preceded by an infinite number of universes and to be
followed by another infinite number of universes. Includes an infinite number
of universes at one given time.
Jain cosmology Jain
Agamas (written around 500 AD as per the teachings of Mahavira 599-527 BC) Cyclical or oscillating, eternal and
finite Jain cosmology considers the
loka, or universe, as an uncreated entity, existing since infinity,the shape of
the universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on
his waist. This Universe, according to Jainism, is narrow at the top, broad at
the middle and once again becomes broad at the bottom.
Babylonian cosmology Babylonian
literature (c. 3000 BC) Flat
earth floating in infinite "waters of chaos" The Earth and the Heavens form a unit within infinite "waters
of chaos"; the earth is flat and circular, and a solid dome (the
"firmament") keeps out the outer "chaos"-ocean.
Biblical cosmology Genesis
creation narrative (c.500 BC) Flat
earth floating in infinite "waters of chaos" Based on Babylonian cosmology. The Earth and the Heavens form a
unit within infinite "waters of chaos"; the earth is flat and
circular, and a solid dome (the "firmament") keeps out the outer
"chaos"-ocean.
Atomist universe Anaxagoras
(500–428 BC) & later Epicurus Infinite
in extent The universe
contains only two things: an infinite number of tiny seeds, or atoms, and the
void of infinite extent. All atoms are made of the same substance, but differ
in size and shape. Objects are formed from atom aggregations and decay back
into atoms. Incorporates Leucippus' principle of causality: "nothing
happens at random; everything happens out of reason and necessity." The
universe was not ruled by gods.[citation needed]
Pythagorean universe Philolaus
(d. 390 BC) Existence of a
"Central Fire" at the center of the Universe. At the center of the Universe is a central fire, around
which the Earth, Sun, Moon and planets revolve uniformly. The Sun revolves
around the central fire once a year, the stars are immobile. The earth in its
motion maintains the same hidden face towards the central fire, hence it is
never seen. This is the first known non-geocentric model of the Universe.[5]
Stoic universe Stoics
(300 BC – 200 AD) Island
universe The cosmos is finite and
surrounded by an infinite void. It is in a state of flux, as it pulsates in
size and periodically passes through upheavals and conflagrations.
Aristotelian universe Aristotle
(384–322 BC) Geocentric, static, steady
state, finite extent, infinite time Spherical
earth is surrounded by concentric celestial spheres. Universe exists unchanged
throughout eternity. Contains a fifth element, called aether (later known as
quintessence), added to the four Classical elements.
Aristarchean universe Aristarchus
(circa 280 BC) Heliocentric Earth rotates daily on its axis and
revolves annually about the sun in a circular orbit. Sphere of fixed stars is
centered about the sun.
Ptolemaic model (based on Aristotelian universe) Ptolemy (2nd century AD) Geocentric Universe orbits about a stationary Earth. Planets move in
circular epicycles, each having a center that moved in a larger circular orbit
(called an eccentric or a deferent) around a center-point near the Earth. The
use of equants added another level of complexity and allowed astronomers to
predict the positions of the planets. The most successful universe model of all
time, using the criterion of longevity. Almagest (the Great System).
Aryabhatan model Aryabhata
(499) Geocentric or
Heliocentric The Earth rotates
and the planets move in elliptical orbits, possibly around either the Earth or
the Sun. It is uncertain whether the model is geocentric or heliocentric due to
planetary orbits given with respect to both the Earth and the Sun.
Medieval universe Medieval
philosophers (500–1200) Finite in
time A universe that is finite in
time and has a beginning is proposed by the Christian philosopher John
Philoponus, who argues against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past.
Logical arguments supporting a finite universe are developed by the early
Muslim philosopher Alkindus, the Jewish philosopher Saadia Gaon and the Muslim
theologian Algazel.
Multiversal cosmology Fakhr
al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209) Multiverse,
multiple worlds & universes There
exists an infinite outer space beyond the known world, and God has the power to
fill the vacuum with an infinite number of universes.
Maragha models Maragha
school (1259–1528) Geocentric Various modifications to Ptolemaic
model and Aristotelian universe, including rejection of equant and eccentrics
at Maragheh observatory, and introduction of Tusi-couple by Al-Tusi.
Alternative models later proposed, including the first accurate lunar model by
Ibn al-Shatir, a model rejecting stationary Earth in favour of Earth's rotation
by Ali Kuşçu, and planetary model incorporating "circular inertia" by
Al-Birjandi.
Nilakanthan model Nilakantha
Somayaji (1444–1544) Geocentric
and Heliocentric A universe in
which the planets orbit the Sun and the Sun orbits the Earth, similar to the
later Tychonic system.
Copernican universe Nicolaus
Copernicus (1473–1543) Heliocentric
with circular planetary orbits First
clearly described heliocentric model, in De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.
Tychonic system Tycho
Brahe (1546–1601) Geocentric
and Heliocentric A universe in
which the planets orbit the Sun and the Sun orbits the Earth, similar to the
earlier Nilakanthan model.
Keplerian Johann
Kepler (1571–1630) Heliocentric
with elliptical planetary orbits Kepler's
discoveries, marrying mathematics and physics, provided the foundation for our
present conception of the Solar system, but distant stars were still seen as
objects in a thin, fixed celestial sphere.
Static Newtonian Sir
Isaac Newton (1642–1727) Static
(evolving), steady state, infinite Every
particle in the universe attracts every other particle. Matter on the large
scale is uniformly distributed. Gravitationally balanced but unstable.
Cartesian Vortex universe René
Descartes
17th century
Static (evolving), steady state, infinite A system of huge swirling whirlpools of
aethereal or fine matter produces what we would call gravitational effects. His
vacuum was not empty. All space was filled with matter that swirled around in
large and small vortices.
Hierarchical universe Immanuel
Kant, Johann Lambert 18th century Static
(evolving), steady state, infinite Matter
is clustered on ever larger scales of hierarchy. Matter is endlessly being
recycled.
Einstein Universe with a cosmological constant Albert Einstein 1917 Static (nominally). Bounded (finite) "Matter without motion." Contains uniformly
distributed matter. Uniformly curved spherical space; based on Riemann's
hypersphere. Curvature is set equal to Λ. In effect Λ is equivalent to a
repulsive force which counteracts gravity. Unstable.
De Sitter universe Willem
de Sitter 1917 Expanding flat space.
Steady state. Λ > 0
"Motion without matter." Only apparently static.
Based on Einstein's General Relativity. Space expands with constant
acceleration. Scale factor (radius of universe) increases exponentially, i.e.
constant inflation.
MacMillan universe William
Duncan MacMillan 1920s Static
&
steady state
New matter is created from radiation. Starlight is
perpetually recycled into new matter particles.
Friedmann universe of spherical space Alexander Friedmann 1922 Spherical
expanding space.
k= +1 ; no Λ
Positive curvature. Curvature constant k = +1
Expands then recollapses. Spatially closed (finite).
Friedmann universe of hyperbolic space Alexander Friedmann 1924 Hyperbolic expanding space.
k= -1 ; no Λ
Negative curvature. Said to be infinite (but ambiguous).
Unbounded. Expands forever.
Dirac large numbers hypothesis Paul Dirac 1930s Expanding Demands a large variation in G, which
decreases with time. Gravity weakens as universe evolves.
Friedmann zero-curvature, a.k.a. the Einstein-DeSitter
universe Einstein &
DeSitter 1932 Expanding
flat space.
k= 0 ; Λ = 0 Critical density
Curvature constant k = 0. Said to be infinite (but
ambiguous). 'Unbounded cosmos of limited extent.' Expands forever. 'Simplest'
of all known universes. Named after but not considered by Friedmann. Has a deceleration
term q =½ which means that its expansion rate slows down.
The original Big Bang. a.k.a. Friedmann-Lemaître Model Georges Lemaître 1927–29 Expansion
Λ > 0 Λ > |Gravity|
Λ is positive and has a magnitude greater than Gravity.
Universe has initial high density state ('primeval atom'). Followed by a two
stage expansion. Λ is used to destabilize the universe. (Lemaître is considered
to be the father of the big bang model.)
Oscillating universe
(a.k.a. Friedmann-Einstein; was latter's 1st choice after rejecting
his own 1917 model)
Favored by Friedmann
1920s
Expanding and contracting in cycles Time is endless and beginningless; thus avoids the
beginning-of-time paradox. Perpetual cycles of big bang followed by big crunch.
Eddington Arthur
Eddington 1930 First Static
then Expands
Static Einstein 1917 universe with its instability disturbed
into expansion mode; with relentless matter dilution becomes a DeSitter
universe. Λ dominates gravity.
Milne universe of kinematic relativity Edward Milne, 1933, 1935;
William H. McCrea, 1930s
Kinematic expansion with NO space expansion Rejects general relativity and the expanding
space paradigm. Gravity not included as initial assumption. Obeys cosmological
principle & rules of special relativity. The Milne expanding universe
consists of a finite spherical cloud of particles (or galaxies) that expands
WITHIN flat space which is infinite and otherwise empty. It has a center and a
cosmic edge (the surface of the particle cloud) which expands at light speed.
His explanation of gravity was elaborate and unconvincing. For instance, his
universe has an infinite number of particles, hence infinite mass, within a
finite cosmic volume.
Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker class of models Howard Robertson, Arthur Walker,
1935 Uniformly expanding Class of universes that are
homogenous and isotropic. Spacetime separates into uniformly curved space and
cosmic time common to all comoving observers. The formulation system is now
known as the FLRW or Robertson-Walker metrics of cosmic time and curved space.
Steady-state expanding (Bondi & Gold) Herman Bondi, Thomas Gold 1948 Expanding, steady state, infinite Matter creation rate maintains
constant density. Continuous creation out of nothing from nowhere. Exponential
expansion. Deceleration term q = -1.
Steady-state expanding (Hoyle) Fred Hoyle 1948 Expanding,
steady state; but unstable Matter
creation rate maintains constant density. But since matter creation rate must
be exactly balanced with the space expansion rate the system is unstable.
Ambiplasma Hannes
Alfvén 1965 Oskar Klein Cellular
universe, expanding by means of matter-antimatter annihilation Based on the concept of plasma
cosmology. The universe is viewed as meta-galaxies divided by double layers
—hence its bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other bubbles.
Ongoing cosmic matter-antimatter annihilations keep the bubbles separated and
moving apart preventing them from interacting.
Brans-Dicke Carl
H. Brans; Robert H. Dicke Expanding Based on Mach's principle. G varies
with time as universe expands. "But nobody is quite sure what Mach's
principle actually means."[citation needed]
Cosmic inflation Alan
Guth 1980 Big Bang with modification to
solve horizon problem and flatness problem. Based
on the concept of hot inflation. The universe is viewed as a multiple quantum
flux —hence its bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other
bubbles. Ongoing cosmic expansion kept the bubbles separated and moving apart
preventing them from interacting.
Eternal Inflation (a multiple universe model) Andreï Linde 1983 Big Bang with cosmic inflation A multiverse, based on the concept of cold inflation, in which
inflationary events occur at random each with independent initial conditions;
some expand into bubble universes supposedly like our entire cosmos. Bubbles
nucleate in a spacetime foam.
Cyclic model Paul
Steinhardt; Neil Turok 2002 Expanding
and contracting in cycles; M-theory. Two
parallel orbifold planes or M-branes collide periodically in a higher
dimensional space. With quintessence or dark energy.
Cyclic model Lauris
Baum; Paul Frampton 2007 Solution
of Tolman's entropy problem Phantom dark
energy fragments universe into large number of disconnected patches. Our patch
contracts containing only dark energy with zero entropy.
Table notes: the term "static" simply means not
expanding and not contracting. Symbol G represents Newton's gravitational
constant; Λ (Lambda) is the cosmological constant.
[edit]Physical cosmology
Main article: Physical cosmology
Physical cosmology is the branch of physics and astrophysics
that deals with the study of the physical origins and evolution of the
Universe. It also includes the study of the nature of the Universe on its very
largest scales. In its earliest form it was what is now known as celestial
mechanics, the study of the heavens. The Greek philosophers Aristarchus of
Samos, Aristotle and Ptolemy proposed different cosmological theories. In
particular, the geocentric Ptolemaic system was the accepted theory to explain
the motion of the heavens until Nicolaus Copernicus, and subsequently Johannes
Kepler and Galileo Galilei proposed a heliocentric system in the 16th century.
This is known as one of the most famous examples of epistemological rupture in
physical cosmology.
With Isaac Newton and the 1687 publication of Principia
Mathematica, the problem of the motion of the heavens was finally solved.
Newton provided a physical mechanism for Kepler's laws and his law of universal
gravitation allowed the anomalies in previous systems, caused by gravitational
interaction between the planets, to be resolved. A fundamental difference
between Newton's cosmology and those preceding it was the Copernican principle
that the bodies on earth obey the same physical laws as all the celestial
bodies. This was a crucial philosophical advance in physical cosmology.
Modern scientific cosmology is usually considered to have
begun in 1917 with Albert Einstein's publication of his final modification of
general relativity in the paper "Cosmological Considerations of the
General Theory of Relativity," (although this paper was not widely
available outside of Germany until the end of World War I). General relativity
prompted cosmogonists such as Willem de Sitter, Karl Schwarzschild and Arthur
Eddington to explore the astronomical consequences of the theory, which
enhanced the growing ability of astronomers to study very distant objects.
Prior to this (and for some time afterwards), physicists assumed that the
Universe was static and unchanging.
In parallel to this dynamic approach to cosmology, one
long-standing debate about the structure of the cosmos was coming to a climax.
Mount Wilson astronomer Harlow Shapley championed the model of a cosmos made up
of the Milky Way star system only ; while Heber D. Curtis argued for the idea
that spiral nebulae were star systems in their own right – island universes.
This difference of ideas came to a climax with the organization of the Great
Debate at the meeting of the (US) National Academy of Sciences in Washington on
26 April 1920. The resolution of this debate came with the detection of novae
in the Andromeda galaxy by Edwin Hubble in 1923 and 1924. Their distance
established spiral nebulae well beyond the edge of the Milky Way and has
galaxies of their own.
Subsequent modeling of the universe explored the possibility
that the cosmological constant introduced by Einstein in his 1917 paper may
result in an expanding universe, depending on its value. Thus the big bang
model was proposed by the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître in 1927 which was
subsequently corroborated by Edwin Hubble's discovery of the red shift in 1929
and later by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation by Arno
Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson in 1964. These findings were a first step to
rule out some of many alternative physical cosmologies.
Recent observations made by the COBE and WMAP satellites
observing this background radiation have effectively, in many scientists' eyes,
transformed cosmology from a highly speculative science into a predictive
science, as these observations matched predictions made by a theory called
Cosmic inflation, which is a modification of the standard big bang model. This
has led many to refer to modern times as the "Golden age of
cosmology."[6]
[edit]Religious and mythological cosmology
See also: Religious cosmology
Religious and mythological cosmology deals with the world as
the totality of space, time and all phenomena. Historically, it has had quite a
broad scope, and in many cases was founded in religion. The ancient Greeks did
not draw a distinction between this use and their model for the cosmos.
However, in modern use it addresses questions about the Universe which are
beyond the scope of science. It is distinguished from religious cosmology in
that it approaches these questions using philosophical methods (e.g.
dialectics). Modern metaphysical cosmology tries to address questions such as:
What is the origin of the Universe? What is its first cause?
Is its existence necessary? (see monism, pantheism, emanationism and
creationism)
What are the ultimate material components of the Universe?
(see mechanism, dynamism, hylomorphism, atomism)
What is the ultimate reason for the existence of the
Universe? Does the cosmos have a purpose? (see teleology)
Does the existence of consciousness have a purpose? How do
we know what we know about the totality of the cosmos? Does cosmological
reasoning reveal metaphysical truths? (see epistemology)
.jpg)

.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment